4.6 Article

Linear distributed inverse solutions for interictal EEG source localisation

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages 58-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.10.008

Keywords

Minimum Norm; Weighted Minimum Norm; LORETA; Local Autoregressive Average; sLORETA; eLORETA

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [SNSF 169198, 192749, CRSII5 170873]
  2. German Research Foundation [DFG 422589384]
  3. Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM) of Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared 6 linear distributed inverse solutions for EEG source localization, finding that LORETA and LAURA provided the highest spatial accuracy both clinically and in simulated data, as well as exhibiting high robustness towards noise. This suggests that LORETA and LAURA may be preferred for interictal EEG source localization among the tested algorithms.
Objective: To compare the spatial accuracy of 6 linear distributed inverse solutions for EEG source localisation of interictal epileptic discharges: Minimum Norm, Weighted Minimum Norm, Low-Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA), Local Autoregressive Average (LAURA), Standardised LORETA, and Exact LORETA. Methods: Spatial accuracy was assessed clinically by retrospectively comparing the maximum source of averaged interictal discharges to the resected brain area in 30 patients with successful epilepsy surgery, based on 204-channel EEG. Additionally, localisation errors of the inverse solutions were assessed in computer simulations, with different levels of noise added to the signal in both sensor space and source space. Results: In the clinical evaluations, the source maximum was located inside the resected brain area in 50- 57% of patients when using LORETA or LAURA, while all other inverse solutions performed significantly worse (17-30%; corrected p < 0.01). In the simulation studies, when noise levels exceeded 10%, LORETA and LAURA had substantially smaller localisation errors than the other inverse solutions. Conclusions: LORETA and LAURA provided the highest spatial accuracy both in clinical and simulated data, alongside with a comparably high robustness towards noise. Significance: Among the different linear inverse solution algorithms tested, LORETA and LAURA might be preferred for interictal EEG source localisation. (c) 2021 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available