4.6 Article

Electrodiagnosis of Guillain-Barre syndrome in the International GBS Outcome Study: Differences in methods and reference values

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 231-240

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.014

Keywords

AIDP; AMAN; AMSAN; Electromyography; Reference values; Nerve conduction studies

Funding

  1. CIDP Foundation International, gain
  2. University Medical Center, Glasgow University
  3. Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds
  4. CSL Behring
  5. Grifols
  6. Annexon and Hansa Biopharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the heterogeneity of electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies in Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) patients collected as part of the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS). The results showed extensive variation in the clinical practice of EDx among IGOS centers across different regions. This diversity is likely to be present in other neuromuscular disorders and centers, emphasizing the need for standardization of EDx in future multinational GBS studies.
Objective: To describe the heterogeneity of electrodiagnostic (EDx) studies in Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) patients collected as part of the International GBS Outcome Study (IGOS).Methods: Prospectively collected clinical and EDx data were available in 957 IGOS patients from 115 centers. Only the first EDx study was included in the current analysis.Results: Median timing of the EDx study was 7 days (interquartile range 4-11) from symptom onset. Methodology varied between centers, countries and regions. Reference values from the responding 103 centers were derived locally in 49%, from publications in 37% and from a combination of these in the remaining 15%. Amplitude measurement in the EDx studies (baseline-to-peak or peak-to-peak) differed from the way this was done in the reference values, in 22% of motor and 39% of sensory conduction. There was marked variability in both motor and sensory reference values, although only a few outliers accounted for this.Conclusions: Our study showed extensive variation in the clinical practice of EDx in GBS patients among IGOS centers across the regions. Significance: Besides EDx variation in GBS patients participating in IGOS, this diversity is likely to be present in other neuromuscular disorders and centers. This underlines the need for standardization of EDx in future multinational GBS studies.(c) 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available