Journal
CLINICAL LUNG CANCER
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 253-263Publisher
CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.10.010
Keywords
Clinical trial outcomes; Maintenance therapy; NSCLC; Safety; Survival
Categories
Funding
- Eli Lilly and Company
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study pooled and analyzed data from randomized studies to compare the overall survival and safety of pemetrexed-only maintenance versus pemetrexed +/- anti-VEGF maintenance in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. The results showed no significant difference in overall survival between the two maintenance therapies and both were well-tolerated.
Data from 4 randomized studies of treatment with pemetrexed/platinum +/- anti-VEGF followed by pemetrexed +/- anti-VEGF maintenance for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer were pooled and analyzed for overall survival and safety. No significant difference in overall survival was found between pemetrexed-only versus pemetrexed + anti-VEGF maintenance. Both maintenance therapies were tolerable across the length of treatment. Background: Before immune checkpoint blockade therapy, chemotherapy with pemetrexed maintenance was the standard of care for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC) and remains such where immunotherapy is not applicable. This pooled analysis aimed to characterize overall survival (OS) and safety of pemetrexed +/- anti-VEGF maintenance, by treatment duration. Patients and Methods: Data from 4 random-ized clinical trials (PARAMOUNT, PRONOUNCE, PointBreak, JVBL) of patients with NSQ-NSCLC receiving pemetrexed +/- anti-VEGF maintenance therapy were pooled as 2 groups (Group A: pemetrexed-only maintenance, n = 486; and Group B: pemetrexed + anti-VEGF maintenance, n = 329). OS and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed in both groups by treatment duration. Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between both groups. Median OS did not significantly differ between Group A (16.1 months) and Group B (18.4 months; hazard ratio: 1.17, P = .1417). A correlation between median OS and treatment duration was numerically stronger in Group A ( r = 0.72) versus B ( r = 0.62). Across treatment groups, TEAEs were largely grade 1 to 2 and, with few exceptions, did not increase with increased treatment duration. Conclusion: There was no significant OS difference between pemetrexed-only and pemetrexed +/- anti-VEGF maintenance in patients with NSQ-NSCLC. Patients receiving pemetrexed + anti-VEGF experienced a slightly less favorable safety profile with more reported TEAEs compared to pemetrexed monother-apy. Pemetrexed +/- anti-VEGF maintenance therapy may be considered in NSQ-NSCLC, based on an individualized patient approach, particularly where immunotherapy is not clinically indicated. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available