4.7 Article

Toward Understanding Death

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages S341-S342

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab809

Keywords

mortality; pathology; cause-of-death; population health

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1180554]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1180554] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence-based approaches are crucial in preventing child deaths, and minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is a powerful technique to obtain key information on causes of death. The Gates Foundation is committed to establishing and improving this methodology to gather high-quality data on major causes of death in young children. The MITS Surveillance Alliance was launched in 2018 to enhance the use of MITS in high mortality settings and has shown promising results in improving mortality surveillance.
Evidence-based approaches to preventing child death require evidence; without data on common causes of child mortality, taking effective action to prevent these deaths is difficult at best. Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is a potentially powerful, but nascent, technique to obtain gold standard information on causes of death. The Gates Foundation committed to further establishing the methodology and obtain the highest quality information on the major causes of death for children under 5 years. In 2018, the MITS Surveillance Alliance was launched to implement, refine, and enhance the use of MITS across high mortality settings. The Alliance and its members have contributed to some remarkable opportunities to improve mortality surveillance, and we have only just begun to understand the possibilities on larger scales. This supplement showcases studies conducted by MITS Surveillance Alliance members and represents a significant contribution to the cause-of-death literature from high mortality settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available