Journal
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 1757-+Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.036
Keywords
Adverse Events; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection; Post-Polypectomy Bleeding; Serrated Polyps
Categories
Funding
- Boston Scientific
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study found that the risk of post-procedure bleeding is low for large serrated polyps removed via endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and there is no discernable benefit of prophylactic clipping of the resection base in this group. However, for large adenomatous polyps, clipping was associated with a lower risk of post-procedure bleeding and overall serious adverse events.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Serrated polyps are important colorectal cancer precursors and are most commonly located in the proximal colon, where post-polypectomy bleeding rates are higher. There is limited clinical trial evidence to guide best practices for resection of large serrated polyps (LSPs). METHODS: In a multicenter trial, patients with large (>= 20 mm) non-pedunculated polyps undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) were randomized to clipping of the resection base or no clipping. This analysis is stratified by histologic subtype of study polyp(s), categorized as serrated [sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) or hyperplastic polyps (HPs)] or adenomatous, comparing clip vs control groups. The primary outcome was severe post-procedure bleeding within 30 days of colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 179 participants with 199 LSPs (191 SSLs and 8 HPs) and 730 participants with 771 adenomatous polyps were included in the study. Overall, 5 patients with LSPs (2.8%) experienced post-procedure bleeding compared with 42 (5.8%) of those with adenomas. There was no difference in post-procedure bleeding rates between patients in the clip vs control group among those with LSPs (2.3% vs 3.3%, respectively, difference 1.0%; P = NS). However, among those with adenomatous polyps, clipping was associated with a lower risk of post-procedure bleeding (3.9% vs 7.6%, difference 3.7%; P =.03) and overall serious adverse events (5.5% vs 10.6%, difference 5.1%; P =.01). CONCLUSION: The post-procedure bleeding risk for LSPs removed via EMR is low, and there is no discernable benefit of prophylactic clipping of the resection base in this group. This study indicates that the benefit of endoscopic clipping following EMR may be specific for >2 cm adenomatous polyps located in the proximal colon.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available