4.6 Review

S100B in cardiac surgery brain monitoring: friend or foe?

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 317-331

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-1012

Keywords

brain injury; cardiac surgery; cardiopulmonary bypass; neurobiomarker; neuromonitoring; S100B

Funding

  1. Italian Society of Neonatology
  2. I Colori della Vita Foundation, Italy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent advances in perioperative management have significantly reduced mortality rate in open heart surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass for heart disease repair. However, the morbidity rate remains unchanged. The measurement of neuro-biomarkers, particularly S100B protein, can be useful in detecting early stage brain damage during the perioperative period. This review provides an updated overview of the pros and cons of using S100B protein for perioperative monitoring in both adult and pediatric patients.
Recent advances in perioperative management of adult and pediatric patients requiring open heart surgery (OHS) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for cardiac and/or congenital heart diseases repair allowed a significant reduction in the mortality rate. Conversely morbidity rate pattern has a flat trend. Perioperative period is crucial since OHS and CPB are widely accepted as a deliberate hypoxic-ischemic reperfusion damage representing the cost to pay at a time when standard of care monitoring procedures can be silent or unavailable. In this respect, the measurement of neuro-biomarkers (NB), able to detect at early stage perioperative brain damage could be especially useful. In the last decade, among a series of NB, S100B protein has been investigated. After the first promising results, supporting the usefulness of the protein as predictor of short/long term adverse neurological outcome, the protein has been progressively abandoned due to a series of limitations. In the present review we offer an up-dated overview of the main S100B pros and cons in the peri-operative monitoring of adult and pediatric patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available