4.7 Article

A Randomized Trial of Fulvestrant, Everolimus, and Anastrozole for the Front-line Treatment of Patients with Advanced Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer, SWOG S1222

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 611-617

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3131

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. SWOG Cancer Research Network under The Hope Foundation for Cancer Research
  2. AstraZeneca plc
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  4. Janssen Diagnostics
  5. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  6. Alan Joseph Endowed Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the effectiveness of combination therapy in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. However, the results showed that combination treatment did not improve progression-free survival or overall survival. In addition, baseline circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were associated with prognosis.
Purpose: Metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer is an important cause of cancer mortality. Endocrine treatment with or without additional targeted therapies has been the mainstay of treatment. This trial was designed to evaluate the combination of fulvestrant plus everolimus versus fulvestrant, everolimus, and anastrozole compared with fulvestrant alone in the first-line treatment of advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Patients and Methods: This randomized placebo-controlled trial included postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-nega-tive advanced breast cancer who had received no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Participants were randomized to one of three treatment arms and the primary outcome was progression -free survival (PFS), comparing combinations of fulvestrant and everolimus with or without anastrozole with fulvestrant alone. Circulating tumor cells (CTC), as measured with two different methods, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were evaluated serially prior to treatment and the beginning of the second cycle of therapy. Results: Due in part to changes in clinical practice, the study was closed after accruing only 37 participants. There was no evidence that everolimus-containing combination treatment improved PFS or overall survival relative to fulvestrant alone. When modeled continuously, an association was observed of baseline CTC and ctDNA with poorer survival. Conclusions: Although power of the study was limited, the findings were unable to support the routine use of everolimus combination endocrine therapy in the first-line treatment of advanced hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Prognostic impact of baseline ctDNA and copy-number variations in CTC was demonstrated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available