4.1 Review

Clinical decision support in primary care for better diagnosis and management of retinal disease

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY
Volume 105, Issue 6, Pages 562-572

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.2008791

Keywords

Clinical decision support; evidence-based medicine; information technology; primary care; retinal disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Commonwealth of Australia through an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  2. Guide Dogs NSW/ACT N/A

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical decision support systems have the potential to reduce misdiagnosis and improve the effectiveness and efficiency of eye care by providing timely recommendations to clinicians. This review discusses different types of clinical decision support systems and their applications in diagnostic effectiveness and management of retinal disease.
Misdiagnosis of retinal disease is a common problem in primary care that can lead to irreversible vision loss and false-positive referrals, resulting in inappropriate use of health services. Clinical decision support systems describe tools that leverage information technology to provide timely recommendations that assist clinicians in the decisions they make about the care of a patient. They, therefore, have the potential to reduce the rate of misdiagnosis by promoting evidence-based medicine and more effective and efficient healthcare. This narrative review aims to support primary care practitioners in better understanding the current and emerging capacity of clinical decision support systems in eye care. Different types of clinical decision support systems are discussed, using current examples and evidence from the available literature to demonstrate how they may improve diagnostic effectiveness and aid the management of retinal disease. Comments are made on the future directions of clinical decision support in primary eye care and the potential applications of artificial intelligence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available