4.7 Review

Neonatal sepsis at point of care

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 521, Issue -, Pages 45-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.06.021

Keywords

Neonatal Sepsis; Host; Pathogen; Biomarkers; POC test; Multiple analyte

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Science Engineering Research Board, New Delhi, India [YSS/2015/000846]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sepsis in neonates, caused by infection and inflammation, is a leading cause of death worldwide. Early diagnosis and comprehensive evaluation are crucial for effective clinical management. The advancement in biosensing technology offers potential for improved diagnostic methods in septic neonates.
Sepsis, which includes infection followed by inflammation, is one of the leading causes of death among neonates worldwide. The major attribute of this disease process is dysregulated host response to infection leading to organ dysfunction and potentially death. A comprehensive understanding of the host response as well as the pathogen itself are important factors contributing to outcome. Early diagnosis is paramount, as it leads to accurate assessment and improved clinical management. Accordingly, a number of diagnostic platforms have been introduced to assess the presence of blood stream pathogens in septic neonates. Unfortunately, current point-ofcare (POC) methods rely on a single parameter/biomarker and thus lack a comprehensive evaluation. The emerging field of biosensing has, however, resulted in the development of a wide range of analytical devices that may be useful at POC. This review discusses currently available methods to screen the inflammatory process in neonatal sepsis. We describe POC sensor-based methods for single platform multi-analyte detection and highlight the latest advances in this evolving technology. Finally, we critically evaluate the applicability of these POC devices clinically for early diagnosis of sepsis in neonates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available