4.7 Article

Assessment of tryptophan and kynurenine as prognostic markers in patients with SARS-CoV-2

Journal

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 525, Issue -, Pages 29-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.12.005

Keywords

Tryptophan; Kynurenine; SARS-CoV-2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measuring the concentrations of tryptophan and kynurenine upon admission, as well as calculating the KYN/TRP ratio, can predict the survival outcome of patients with SARS-CoV-2.
Background: Immune dysregulation and inflammation in patients with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a poor clinical outcome. We investigated the value of the inflammatory markers tryptophan and kynurenine in predicting the survival outcome of patients with SARS-CoV-2. Methods: The study included 252 inpatients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection hospitalized between August 2020 and April 2021. Two groups were generated based on disease survival (survival group: n = 199; deceased group: n = 53). Plasma concentrations of tryptophan, kynurenine and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured on admission. In a subset of patients (n = 105; 81 survivors and 24 deceased) concentrations of tryptophan and kynurenine were checked 7 days after admission. The kynurenine/tryptophan ratio (TRP/KYN ratio) was calculated. Results: On admission, the deceased group showed significantly higher concentrations of kynurenine and a significantly higher KYN/TRP ratio compared to the survival group (p-values < 0.001). Kynurenine and the KYN/TRP ratio significantly correlated with IL-6 (rho = 0.441 and 0.448, p-values < 0.001). In the survival group, kynurenine and the KYN/TRPratio were significantly lower after seven days (p-values < 0.001). In the deceased group, no significant differences were found between the measurements. Conclusion: Kynurenine and the KYN/TRP ratio are potentially useful parameters in predicting the survival outcome in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available