4.5 Article

Projections of indices of daily temperature and precipitation based on bias-adjusted CORDEX-Africa regional climate model simulations

Journal

CLIMATIC CHANGE
Volume 170, Issue 1-2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-022-03307-0

Keywords

Climate change projections; Bias-adjustment; CORDEX; Africa; Regional climate models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This dataset provides bias-adjusted temperature and precipitation projections for continental Africa based on regional climate model simulations. It can be useful for climate change impact studies in various sectors. The bias-adjustment has a significant impact on extreme temperature-related hazards, increasing the projected risks. However, it generally preserves the original results for precipitation indices.
We present a dataset of daily, bias-adjusted temperature and precipitation projections for continental Africa based on a large ensemble of regional climate model simulations, which can be useful for climate change impact studies in several sectors. We provide guidance on the benefits and caveats of using the dataset by investigating the effect of bias-adjustment on impact-relevant indices (both their future absolute value and change). Extreme threshold-based temperature indices show large differences between original and bias-adjusted values at the end of the century due to the general underestimation of temperature in the present climate. These results indicate that when biases are accounted for, projected risks of extreme temperature-related hazards are higher than previously found, with possible consequences for the planning of adaptation measures. Bias-adjusted results for precipitation indices are usually consistent with the original results, with the median change preserved for most regions and indices. The interquartile and full range of the original model ensemble is usually well preserved by bias-adjustment, with the exception of maximum daily precipitation, whose range is usually greatly reduced by the bias-adjustment. This is due to the poor simulation and extremely large model range for this index over the reference period; when the bias is reduced, most models converge in projecting a similar change. Finally, we provide a methodology to select a small subset of simulations that preserves the overall uncertainty in the future projections of the large model ensemble. This result can be useful in practical applications when process-based impact models are too expensive to be run with the full ensemble of model simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available