4.4 Article

Mapping dynamical ejecta and disk masses from numerical relativity simulations of neutron star mergers

Journal

CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac35a8

Keywords

numerical relativity; neutron stars; general relativity; neutron star equation of state; binary neutron star merger

Funding

  1. EU H2020 under ERC Starting Grant [BinGraSp-714626]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Division of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0021177]
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY2011725]
  4. INFN
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021177] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present fitting formulae for the properties of dynamical ejecta and remnant disk masses, and find that microphysics and neutrio absorption have significant impact on the results.
We present fitting formulae for the dynamical ejecta properties and remnant disk masses from the largest to date sample of numerical relativity simulations. The considered data include some of the latest simulations with microphysical nuclear equations of state (EOS) and neutrino transport as well as other results with polytropic EOS available in the literature. Our analysis indicates that the broad features of the dynamical ejecta and disk properties can be captured by fitting expressions, that depend on mass ratio and reduced tidal parameter. The comparative analysis of literature data shows that microphysics and neutrino absorption have a significant impact on the dynamical ejecta properties. Microphysical nuclear EOS lead to average velocities smaller than polytropic EOS, while including neutrino absorption results in larger average ejecta masses and electron fractions. Hence, microphysics and neutrino transport are necessary to obtain quantitative models of the ejecta in terms of the binary parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available