4.6 Article

Cardiac Remodeling and Disease Progression in Patients With Repaired Coarctation of Aorta and Aortic Stenosis

Journal

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages 1091-1099

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.013383

Keywords

aorta; aortic valve stenosis; disease progression; echocardiography; hypertension

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [K23 HL141448]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with repaired coarctation of aorta (COA) and aortic stenosis (AS) have higher left ventricular global pressure load, more advanced cardiac remodeling, and higher incidence of cardiovascular events compared to non-COA patients with similar AS severity. Valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) could be used for risk stratification in timing of aortic valve replacement for these patients.
BACKGROUND: Valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva) is used for assessment of left ventricular (LV) global pressure load in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and impaired arterial compliance. Because patients with repaired coarctation of aorta (COA) have impaired arterial compliance, we hypothesized that COA patients with greater than or equal to moderate AS (AS-COA group) will have higher Zva, symptomatic progression, and cardiovascular events, as compared to non-COA patients with similar AS severity (AS group). METHODS: Propensity matching (1:1) of 71 AS-COA and 71 AS patients based on age, sex, body mass index, and aortic valve mean gradient (cohort 1). Of 172 patients, 117 patients (AS-COA [n=62]; AS [n=55]) underwent aortic valve replacement, cohort 2. Cohort 1 was used to assess the relationship between preoperative Zva, cardiac remodeling, and symptomatic progression, while cohort 2 was used to assess the relationship between postoperative Zva, LV mass index regression (reduction in LV mass index after aortic valve replacement), and cardiovascular events. RESULTS: The AS-COA group had higher Zva (4.2 +/- 0.6 versus 3.5 +/- 0.4 mm Hg/mL.m(2) , P<0.001), more advanced cardiac remodeling, and higher 5-year incidence of symptomatic progression (85% versus 51%, P<0.001). Preoperative Zva was independently associated with cardiac remodeling (r=0.66, P<0.001) and symptomatic progression (hazard ratio, 1.06 [1.02-1.10], per mm Hg/mL.m(2) increase in Zva). The AS-COA group had higher postoperative Zva (3.3 +/- 0.5 versus 2.4 +/- 0.4 mm Hg/mL.m(2) , P<0.001), less robust LV mass index regression at 1-year post-aortic valve replacement, and higher 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events. Postoperative Zva was independently associated with LV mass index regression (r=-0.46, P<0.001) and cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.06 [1.02-1.10], per mm Hg/mL.m(2) increase in Zva). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with AS-COA had higher LV global pressure load, cardiac remodeling, symptomatic progression, and cardiovascular events as compared to non-COA patients with similar severity of AS. Zva can identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes, and perhaps should be used for risk stratification with regards to timing of aortic valve replacement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available