4.1 Article

Heterologous synapsis in C. elegans is regulated by meiotic double-strand breaks and crossovers

Journal

CHROMOSOMA
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages 237-250

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00412-021-00763-y

Keywords

C; elegans; Heterologous synapsis; Synaptonemal complex; Double-strand breaks; Crossover

Funding

  1. NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40 OD010440, R35GM128804]
  2. NIGMS
  3. University of Utah

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alignment of parental chromosomes during meiotic prophase is crucial for genetic exchanges. In C. elegans, reduced levels of meiotic double-strand breaks or crossovers lead to increased heterologous synapsis, suggesting regulation by break formation or repair, as well as chromosome-specific and nucleus-wide regulation.
Alignment of the parental chromosomes during meiotic prophase is key to the formation of genetic exchanges, or crossovers, and consequently to the successful production of gametes. In almost all studied organisms, alignment involves synapsis: the assembly of a conserved inter-chromosomal interface called the synaptonemal complex (SC). While the SC usually synapses homologous sequences, it can assemble between heterologous sequences. However, little is known about the regulation of heterologous synapsis. Here, we study the dynamics of heterologous synapsis in the nematode C. elegans. We characterize two experimental scenarios: SC assembly onto a folded-back chromosome that cannot pair with its homologous partner; and synapsis of pseudo-homologs, a fusion chromosome partnering with an unfused chromosome half its size. We observed elevated levels of heterologous synapsis when the number of meiotic double-strand breaks or crossovers were reduced, indicating that the promiscuity of synapsis is regulated by break formation or repair. In addition, our data suggests the existence of both chromosome-specific and nucleus-wide regulation on heterologous synapsis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available