4.5 Review

Structure design for high performance n-type polymer thermoelectric materials

Journal

CHINESE PHYSICS B
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/ac3a64

Keywords

organic thermoelectrics; conducting polymers; organic semiconductor doping

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [21D110637]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52173156]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China [20JC1414900]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences (Faculty Consultation and Evaluation Project) [2020-ZW07-A-017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the performance and factors affecting n-type organic thermoelectric (OTE) materials, with a focus on the effect of backbone planarity on doping efficiency and thermoelectric performance. Strategies for improving performance, such as implementing rigid backbones or modifying conventional building blocks, are summarized. The outlook section highlights new possibilities for the future development of this field.
Organic thermoelectric (OTE) materials have been regarded as a potential candidate to harvest waste heat from complex, low temperature surfaces of objects and convert it into electricity. Recently, n-type conjugated polymers as organic thermoelectric materials have aroused intensive research in order to improve their performance to match up with their p-type counterpart. In this review, we discuss aspects that affect the performance of n-type OTEs, and further focus on the effect of planarity of backbone on the doping efficiency and eventually the TE performance. We then summarize strategies such as implementing rigid n-type polymer backbone or modifying conventional polymer building blocks for more planar conformation. In the outlook part, we conclude forementioned devotions and point out new possibility that may promote the future development of this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available