4.6 Article

Subsurface Defect Evaluation of Selective-Laser-Melted Inconel 738LC Alloy Using Eddy Current Testing for Additive/Subtractive Hybrid Manufacturing

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s10033-021-00633-9

Keywords

Eddy current testing; Subsurface defect; Additive; subtractive hybrid manufacturing; Selective laser melting; Inconel 738LC alloy

Funding

  1. Basic Research Project of Science and Technology Plan of Shenzhen [JCYJ20170817111811303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effect of influencing factors on defect EC signals of Inconel 738LC alloy produced by selective laser melting. It revealed qualitative and quantitative relationships between influencing factors and corresponding EC signals, providing a practical reference for quantitatively inspecting subsurface defects on SLMed parts.
New materials and manufacturing technologies require applicable non-destructive techniques for quality assurance so as to achieve better performance. This study comprehensively investigated the effect of influencing factors including excitation frequency, lift-off distance, defect depth and size, residual heat, and surface roughness on the defect EC signals of an Inconel 738LC alloy produced by selective laser melting (SLM). The experimental investigations recorded the impedance amplitude and phase angle of EC signals for each defect to explore the feasibility of detecting subsurface defects by merely analyzing these two key indicators. Overall, this study revealed preliminary qualitative and roughly quantitative relationships between influencing factors and corresponding EC signals, which provided a practical reference on how to quantitively inspect subsurface defects using eddy current testing (ECT) on SLMed parts, and also made solid progress toward on-line ECT in additive/subtractive hybrid manufacturing (ASHM) for fabricating SLMed parts with enhanced quality and better performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available