4.5 Article

Fabrication of azobenzene-functionalized porous polymers for selective CO2 capture

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 24-30

Publisher

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2021.10.029

Keywords

Adsorption; CO2 capture; Selectivity; Azobenzene; Photoresponse

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [22125804]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22178163, 22078155, 21808105, 21878149]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of azobenzene-functionalized porous polymers (PTM-AZOs) were successfully synthesized, and their CO₂ capture performance was improved by regulating the variable pore structure.
Many solid adsorbents have been prepared for the CO2 capture. In particular, the photoresponsive adsorbents have attracted extensive interests because of their tunable pore structure and variable responsive behaviors provoked by the external light. However, it is challenging to fabricate the photoresponsive adsorbents featured the big CO(2 )capacity and high CO2 selectivity. Herein, copolymerized between 4-phenylazobenzoyl chloride, 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine and melamine, a series of azobenzene-functionalized porous polymers (PTM-AZOs) are successfully synthesized. The PTM-AZOs are verified in possession of proper pore structures, large surface area and photoconductive properties through a series of characterization. The PTM-AZO-2 with the trans-isomerization exhibits the best CO2 adsorption amount of 2.7 mmol.g(-1) (273 K and 0.1 MPa), while the CO2/N-2 selectivity can reach 2459 and 607 on the trans- and cis-isomerization, respectively. The regulatable pore structures controlled by the photoresponsive azobenzene groups affect the CO2 capture performance of the PTM-AZOs. (C) 2021 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available