4.7 Article

Enhanced spread of expiratory droplets by turbulence in a cough jet

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 93, Issue -, Pages 86-96

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.018

Keywords

Turbulent cough jets; Expiratory droplets; Particle tracking model; Evaporation; Dispersion

Funding

  1. RGC [HKU7142/12]
  2. NSFC [51278440]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coughing has been confirmed as a significant vector for transmitting respiratory diseases. It can be modelled physically as a turbulent jet to study the dispersion of expiratory droplets. The discrete random walk model for particle tracking is employed to study the effect of turbulence fluctuation on dispersion of particles and/or droplets. The concept of reach probability is proposed to characterise the streamwise spread distance. Our study shows that jet-like cough airflow turbulence prompts the wide spread of particles and expiratory droplets, and that the effect of evaporation on medium droplets (50 gm) is most significant. When turbulence fluctuations are considered for the 100 gm particles, there is a four-fold increase in the dispersion range in the streamwise direction, and a thirteen-fold increase in the transverse direction compared to that without fluctuation. Small particles are found to follow the airflow closely, dispersing in the whole jet region, while only 1% of large particles exceed 2 m in the streamwise direction; nearly 10% of medium particles travel 4.0 m (initial u(0) = 10 m/s, mouth diameter D = 2 cm). Droplets evaporate after being exhaled, but fates of small droplets with initial diameter d(p0) = 30 mu m as well as large droplets with d(p0) = 100 mu m are little affected by relative humidity (RH). The 30 mu m droplets evaporate in seconds and behave similarly to the 10 gm particles. The spread distance of large droplets is mainly determined by the jet outlet diameter and velocity. In contrast, the medium droplets are found to be very sensitive to RH under humid conditions (RH >= 80%). (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available