4.6 Article

Pivotal Role of Holes in Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction on TiO2

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 68, Pages 17213-17219

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202103070

Keywords

CO2 reduction; heterogeneous catalysis; oxidation half reaction; photocatalysis; reaction mechanism

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the scope of the project PROPHECY [FKZ: 033RC003]
  2. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the scope of the project PRODIGY [FKZ: 033RC024]
  3. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that removing photogenerated holes from TiO2 in gas-solid photocatalytic reactions hinders the production of CH4 in CO2 reduction, and coupling the reaction with sacrificial oxidation reactions also inhibits CH4 formation. Additionally, the addition of H-2 can have detrimental effects on the reaction.
Evidence is provided that in a gas-solid photocatalytic reaction the removal of photogenerated holes from a titania (TiO2) photocatalyst is always detrimental for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. The coupling of the reaction to a sacrificial oxidation reaction hinders or entirely prohibits the formation of CH4 as a reduction product. This agrees with earlier work in which the detrimental effect of oxygen-evolving cocatalysts was demonstrated. Photocatalytic alcohol oxidation or even overall water splitting proceeds in these reaction systems, but carbon-containing products from CO2 reduction are no longer observed. H-2 addition is also detrimental, either because it scavenges holes or because it is not an efficient proton donor on TiO2. The results are discussed in light of previously suggested reaction mechanisms for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. The formation of CH4 from CO2 is likely not a linear sequence of reduction steps but includes oxidative elementary steps. Furthermore, new hypotheses on the origin of the required protons are suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available