4.5 Article

Synthesis and in Silico Docking Studies of Ethyl 2-(2-Arylidene-1-alkylhydrazinyl)thiazole-4-carboxylates as Antiglycating Agents

Journal

CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202100581

Keywords

bioorganic chemistry; alkylations; cyclizations; 1; 3-thiazoles; ethyl 2-(2-arylidenehydrazinyl)thiazole-4-carboxylates; antiglycation; biological studies

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University Saudi Arabia [R.G.P. 2/109/42]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ethyl 2-(2-arylidene-1-alkylhydrazinyl)thiazole-4-carboxylates (1a-k) were synthesized and their structures were confirmed by spectro-analytical techniques. Antiglycation assays showed that compounds 1j and 1k exhibited promising activity in reducing diabetic complications.
Ethyl 2-(2-arylidene-1-alkylhydrazinyl)thiazole-4-carboxylates (1a-k) were synthesized by alkylation on HN- of ethyl 2-(2-arylidenehydrazinyl)thiazole-4-carboxylates. The proposed structures (1a-k) are corroborated by spectro-analytical techniques like UV, FT-IR, H-1-, C-13-NMR and HR-MS. All synthesized compounds were screened for their antiglycation and antioxidant assays. The in vitro antiglycation results revealed promising activity of compounds 1a, 1b, 1d, 1e, 1f, 1g, 1j and 1k with IC50 values 0.0004 +/- 1.097-17.22 +/- 0.538 mu M when compared to standard, aminoguanidine (IC50=25.50 +/- 0.337 mu M). Among all tested compounds 1j and 1k are the best antiglycating agents with IC50 values 1.848 +/- 0.646 and 0.0004 +/- 1.097 mu M, respectively. The in-silico studies also agree with these results where binding energy for 1j and 1k was found to be -9.25 and -8.42 kcal/mol with calculated dissociation constants of 0.16 and 0.67 mu M, respectively. The antiglycation results demonstrate the application of these compounds in reducing diabetic complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available