4.7 Article

Source apportionment of indoor and outdoor volatile organic compounds at homes in Edmonton, Canada

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 114-124

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.023

Keywords

VOCs; Positive matrix factorization; Source apportionment; Indoor air quality; Edmonton

Funding

  1. Health Canada [4500295639]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this analysis was to get a better understanding of emission sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and their contributions to indoor and outdoor concentrations in residences of Edmonton, Alberta. Seven consecutive 24-h indoor and outdoor air samples were collected using Summa canisters in 50 non-smoking homes in both winter and summer of 2010, with 26 homes participating in both seasons. In addition, data were also collected on housing characteristics and occupants' daily activities. A total of 193 polar and non-polar VOC species were analyzed by gas chromatograph - mass spectrometry (GC MS). In general, indoor VOC species were found to be substantially higher than outdoor levels during both seasons. A source receptor model positive matrix factorization (PMF) was applied to identify VOC emission sources and apportion airborne concentrations into 13 indoor factors and 10 outdoor factors. More than 70% of total indoor VOCs were attributed to different indoor sources within the residences, where household products were the major contributor (44%, 648 mu g/m(3)), followed by combustion processes and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) (10.5%, 153 mu g/m(3)), deodorizers (8.4%, 122 mu g/m(3)) and off-gassing of building materials (5.9%, 86 mu g/m3). Major outdoor VOC sources included oil and gas industry, traffic emissions, background and biogenic emissions. The findings provide key information about the impact of indoor and outdoor sources on VOC levels in Edmonton homes, which can be useful for developing appropriate risk management measures to improve indoor air quality. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available