4.6 Article

Process design within planetary boundaries: Application to CO2 based methanol production

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 246, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116891

Keywords

Simulation; Surrogate models; Optimization; Planetary boundaries

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical engineering community is increasingly focusing on designing sustainable processes. A new approach incorporating absolute sustainability criteria using the planetary boundaries concept is proposed to address the limitations of conventional life cycle assessment methods. The results show that the sustainability level of fossil-based chemicals can be significantly improved by selecting hydrogen sources appropriately, opening up new avenues for including absolute sustainability criteria in process design.
Designing sustainable processes is gaining momentum in the chemical engineering community. Conventional life cycle assessment approaches often employed to assess the sustainability level of chemical processes can be used to compare alternatives. However, because they lack clear quantitative thresholds above which a process should be deemed unsustainable, the insight provided into whether a technology is truly sustainable in absolute terms is limited. This work covers this gap by incorporating absolute sustainability criteria in process design using the planetary boundaries concept, which defines ecological limits on critical Earth systems. Our method, integrating process simulation, surrogate modeling, and a recent characterization method to compute the impact on the planetary boundaries, is applied to methanol production from hydrogen and CO2. Our results show that the sustainability level of the fossil-based chemical can be improved substantially by adequately selecting the hydrogen source. The new approach unfolds new avenues for including absolute sustainability criteria in process design. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available