4.6 Article

Experimental research on methane hydrate formation in porous media based on the low-field NMR technique

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116804

Keywords

Methane hydrates; Porous media; Low-field NMR; Unhydrated water; Signal intensity; T-2 relaxation time

Funding

  1. National key research and development program [2017YFC0307303]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [41601079, 41571072, 41661103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this experiment, the formation of methane hydrate in porous media was studied using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance technology, revealing variations in the content of unhydrated water in samples with different particle sizes. It was observed that the content of unhydrated water increases with higher initial water content, predominantly existing in small to moderately large pores.
In the experiment, three kinds of sandy soil tests with various particle sizes and starting water substances were chosen for analysis of methane hydrate formation in porous media. In this article, low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) innovation was utilized to consider methane hydrate the kinetics and to analyse the relationship among the adjustments in water signal force, the temperature and pressure, the various qualities of the T-2 relaxation time, and the substance of unhydrated water. In view of the varieties in the NMR signal intensity, the methane-hydrate formation can be separated into four phases: induction, nucleation, growth, and steadiness. In addition, for the samples with particle size of 0.25-0.5 mm, the content of unhydrated water was higher. At a similar particle size, the content of unhydrated water increments with an increasing initial water content; thusly, low unhydrated water content for the most part exists in little and moderately enormous pores. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available