4.6 Article

A hybrid mesoscale closure combining CFD and deep learning for coarse-grid prediction of gas-particle flow dynamics

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 248, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117268

Keywords

Gas-particle flow; Deep learning; Filtered two-fluid model; Mesoscale closure; Coarse grid simulation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1862201, 91834303, 21625603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study develops filtered two-fluid model (fTFM) closures by coupling computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and deep learning algorithm (DL) for enabling coarse-grid simulations at reactor scales. The mesoscale solids stress can be neglected in bubbling and turbulent fluidization regimes, but is significant at very low superficial gas velocities. The drag model considering the anisotropy shows better prediction performance in the turbulent fluidization regime.
This study develops filtered two-fluid model (fTFM) closures by coupling computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and deep learning algorithm (DL) for enabling coarse-grid simulations at reactor scales. Mesoscale drag, solids pressure and viscosity are modeled using an isotropic or anisotropic method. Subsequently, a priori analysis and a posteriori analysis of the present models along with other previously proposed clo-sures are conducted. Comparison with the experimental data covering a broad range of operating condi-tions indicates that the mesoscale solids stress can be neglected in bubbling and turbulent fluidization regimes. However, the contribution of solids stress is clearly not insignificant at very low superficial gas velocities. Moreover, the drag model considering the anisotropy shows better prediction performance in the turbulent fluidization regime. In short, the present study develops and validates a DL-fTFM cou-pling algorithm applicable for gas-particle simulations. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available