4.6 Article

Simulation of a Wurster fluidized bed by CFD-DEM with a cohesive contact model

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 177, Issue -, Pages 157-166

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2021.10.038

Keywords

Wurster fluidized bed; CFD-DEM; Cohesive contact model; Wet particles; Agglomeration

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51976037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A CFD-DEM coupled with a cohesive contact model was developed to simulate a Wurster fluidized bed with heat and mass transfer. The particle temperature distribution showed two peaks, the circulation pattern significantly affected particle drying, and the liquid injection rate influenced particle circulation stability and fluidization condition.
A CFD-DEM coupled with a cohesive contact model is developed for simulation of a Wurster fluidized bed with heat and mass transfer. First, the water evaporation and cohesive contact sub-models are tested, respectively. Second, a Wurster fluidized bed with heating, drying, and wet particle fluidization is simulated. Results show that the particle temperature in the bottom and draft tube rises faster than that in the annular region, which leads to the probability density distribution of the particle temperature presents two peaks. The circulation pattern also has a significant effect on particle drying. Under conditions with a small amount of liquid injection, the water evaporates immediately and the particles are fluidized normally. Increasing the liquid injection rate, the stability of the particle circulation decreases. Under conditions with significant particle cohesion, large agglomerates are formed and the fluidization breaks down. The current study provides an effective method for studying hydrodynamics of Wurster fluidized beds with simultaneous processes of heating, drying, and wet particle fluidization. (c) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available