4.7 Article

Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Gas Hydrate Growth with Impingement

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 426, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130705

Keywords

Methane hydrate; hydrate growth; impingement; molecular dynamics simulation; diffusion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52076032]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2019YFC0312304]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT21LAB121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates methane hydrate growth with impingement using molecular dynamics simulation, revealing unique features like dislocation, two-occupied hydrate cages, and fast methane diffusion. The findings show that methane molecules can hop between different hydrate cages and exhibit a faster diffusion rate when gas bubbles are present.
Clathrate hydrates have attracted much attention in energy and environment technology as well as the nature of icy bodies. We report a molecular dynamics simulation study of methane hydrate growth with impingement which has not been investigated by either experiment or simulation as far as the authors' knowledge. Several unique features have been discovered including dislocation, two occupied hydrate cages and fast methane diffusion. A certain proportion of hydrate cages were found to be occupied simultaneously by two methane molecules, even in the 5(12)6(2) cage which was thought to be impossible. Methane molecules were demonstrated to hop between two-occupied and one-occupied hydrate cages as well as between gas bubble and nearby hydrate cages when a gas bubble was present. The diffusion rate during the hopping process is in the order of 10(-9) to 10(-8) m(2)/s, which is 3 similar to 4 order of magnitude faster than that during hopping between one-occupied and empty hydrate cages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available