4.4 Article

Impacts of Particle Properties on Gas Holdup under Four Flow Regimes in Three-Phase Bubble Columns

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 2347-2354

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202100291

Keywords

Flow regimes; Gas holdup; Gas-liquid-solid flow; Hydrodynamics; Three-phase bubble column reactors

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51706108]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province [17KJB470008]
  3. Science Research Foundation of Nanjing Normal University [184080H202B73]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the effects of solid volume fraction and particle size on gas holdups in gas-liquid-solid bubble columns under different flow regimes. Results showed that gas holdup decreased with higher solid volume fraction in certain flow regimes, while the change in solid volume fraction or particle size had a minor impact in the strong turbulent regime. A new correlation for gas holdup was developed considering particle properties and flow regimes.
The impacts of the solid volume fraction V-s and particle size d(p) on the total and local gas holdups in gas-liquid-solid bubble columns under different flow regimes were investigated. The flow regimes discussed were the discrete bubble regime (DBR), transition regime (TR), bubble coalescence regime (BCR), and strong turbulent regime (STR). The results demonstrated that the bed average gas holdup epsilon(g) decreased with higher solid volume fraction in DBR, TR, and BCR. The increment of the solid volume fraction promoted bubble coalescence and also can enhance the particle effect on the average gas holdup. The epsilon(g) changed slightly when shifting the V-s or d(p) in STR. A new correlation for epsilon(g) was developed considering the particle properties and the flow regimes studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available