4.7 Article

Fe-N-C/Fe nanoparticle composite catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Journal

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 58, Issue 14, Pages 2323-2326

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cc07042h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FT170100224, LP200100255]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP200100255] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a highly active Fe-N-C electrocatalyst containing Fe nanoparticles and FeNx active sites derived from Fe-doped carbonized zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) was developed. The optimized Fe doping amount in the Fe-N-C-300 composite catalyst exhibited excellent activity, stability, and methanol tolerance in challenging acid environment.
Replacing Pt-based catalysts with cost-effective, highly efficient, and durable platinum group metal-free catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is crucial for commercializing hydrogen fuel cells. Herein, we present a highly active Fe-N-C electrocatalyst that contains both Fe nanoparticles and FeNx active sites derived from an Fe-doped carbonized zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8). It is found that adjusting the doping amount of Fe in the Fe-doped ZIF-8 precursor alters the morphology of the catalyst after heat treatment. The Fe-N-C-300 composite catalyst with the optimized Fe doping amount exhibits excellent activity, good stability, and remarkable methanol tolerance in the challenging acid environment. This study reveals that a suitable amount of Fe nanoparticles in the catalyst can alter the structure of the FeNx active moieties and increase three-phase boundaries to boost the mass transport, thus leading to improved fuel cell performance. This will have implications for using Fe-N-C catalysts in real applications, as the formation of Fe NPs during the synthesis and reaction is almost inevitable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available