4.6 Article

Hydrogenation of CO2 over Cobalt-Lanthanide Bimetallic Oxide Nanofibers

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202101548

Keywords

bimetallic oxides; carbon dioxide cobalt; lanthanides; nanofibers

Funding

  1. Portuguese Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, FCT [PTDC/EAM-PEC/28374/2017, UIDB/00100/2020]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EAM-PEC/28374/2017] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cobalt-lanthanide bimetallic oxide nanofibers prepared by electrospinning technique show excellent catalytic performance and deactivation resistance in the hydrogenation of CO2.
Cobalt-lanthanide bimetallic oxide nanofibers (5Co(3)O(4)center dot 3LnCoO(3), Ln=La, Pr; 4Co(3)O(4)center dot Ln(2)O(3), Ln=Sm, Gd, Dy, Yb and 2Co(3)O(4)center dot CeO2) were prepared by electrospinning technique and for the first time evaluated as catalysts for the hydrogenation of CO2. Depending on the lanthanide, the reaction products are different: lighter lanthanides (La, Pr, Sm and Gd) produce mainly CO and are more active to reverse water gas shift (RWGS), whereas the catalysts with Ce, Dy and Yb are more active and selective to methane. Lanthanide intrinsic properties such as ionic radii and basicity strongly correlate with the nanofibers' catalytic performance: lower lanthanide ionic radii and higher basicity favour the catalysts activity. Moreover, the bimetallic oxide nanofibers catalytic behavior also seems to point to the existence of a synergetic interaction between cobalt and lanthanide. The cobalt-lanthanide bimetallic oxides present a high deactivation resistance for at least 60 h in the gaseous stream, which is an advantage for any catalytic application. Compared with a commercial catalyst (5(wt.%) Rh/Al2O3) tested in the same conditions, cobalt-ytterbium, dysprosium and cerium bimetallic oxide nanofibers present an activity 5 to 13 times higher at 350 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available