4.7 Article

Framework to characterize nonlinear flow through pervious concrete

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106633

Keywords

Pervious concrete; Porous medium; Non-Darcian flow; Forchheimer's law; Flow regime

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -Brasil (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the hydraulic behavior of pervious concrete using Forchheimer's law and Darcy's law, finding that flow in some cases does not follow Darcy's law. By studying the relationship between flow resistance parameters and porosity, valuable insights into how heterogeneity in pervious concretes affects flow behavior can be obtained, which may be crucial for designing improved pervious concretes.
Pervious concretes have been increasingly used since they allow for better water flow. Flow through pervious concrete is usually assessed with Darcy's law, which presupposes linearity between flow rate and hydraulic gradient. However, some researchers reported this does not always hold, especially at faster flows. In such cases, Forchheimer's law may be used. In this paper, criteria for delimiting flow regimes was applied to evaluate hydraulic behavior. Forty-two specimens had their porosities measured and were tested in a constant head permeameter. Although low to moderate hydraulic gradients were applied, resulting flows already showed to be non-Darcian. A dimensionless permeability parameter engendered by the mentioned approach was able to adequately and unequivocally grade the flow resistance offered by each specimen. Correlations between this parameter and porosity were obtained and bestowed rich interpretations of how heterogeneity in pervious concretes impacts flow behavior. This may be key for designing better pervious concretes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available