4.5 Review

Evidence for Menopause as a Sex-Specific Risk Factor for Glaucoma

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 79-97

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-021-01179-z

Keywords

Menopause; Glaucoma; Ovariectomy; Biomechanics; Estrogen; Outflow resistance; Retinal ganglion cells; Visual function; Intraocular pressure; Sex specific

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses whether menopause is a sex-specific risk factor for glaucoma and explores the potential role of menopause in the development of the disease.
Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and is characterized by progressive loss of visual function and retinal ganglion cells (RGC). Current epidemiological, clinical, and basic science evidence suggest that estrogen plays a role in the aging of the optic nerve. Menopause, a major biological life event affecting all women, coincides with a decrease in circulating sex hormones, such as estrogen. While 59% of the glaucomatous population are females, sex is not considered a risk factor for developing glaucoma. In this review, we explore whether menopause is a sex-specific risk factor for glaucoma. First, we investigate how menopause is defined as a sex-specific risk factor for other pathologies, including cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, and bone health. Next, we discuss clinical evidence that highlights the potential role of menopause in glaucoma. We also highlight preclinical studies that demonstrate larger vision and RGC loss following surgical menopause and how estrogen is protective in models of RGC injury. Lastly, we explore how surgical menopause and estrogen signaling are related to risk factors associated with developing glaucoma (e.g., intraocular pressure, aqueous outflow resistance, and ocular biomechanics). We hypothesize that menopause potentially sets the stage to develop glaucoma and therefore is a sex-specific risk factor for this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available