4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of the sound absorption characteristics of vegetated roofs

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 335-346

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.023

Keywords

Acoustics; Sound absorption coefficient; Noise reduction; Green; Vegetated roofs; Substrates

Funding

  1. British Columbia Institute of Technology
  2. University of British Columbia
  3. Soprema Canada
  4. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  5. BC Landscape & Nursery Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental investigation of the sound absorption characteristics of vegetated roof substrates and plots has been completed. First, an impedance tube was used to measure the normal-incidence absorption coefficients of substrates and their constituents. Substrates provided significant sound absorption, with coefficients varying from 0.03 at 250 Hz to 0.89 at 2000 Hz. Absorption increased with the percentage of organic matter and decreased with moisture content and compaction. A multi-variable regression model was developed for predicting the absorption of substrates. Secondly, the sound absorption of vegetated roof plots was investigated using the spherical-decoupling method. An optimal method, validated in an anechoic chamber, was used to determine the diffuse-field absorption coefficients of unplanted and planted rooftop test plots. Sound absorption increased with increased substrate depth (without vegetation) and decreased with the addition of vegetation and plant establishment. The mean noise reduction coefficient of established vegetated roof plots, with distinctly different plant communities in substrate depths of 50-200 mm, ranged from 0.20 to 0.63 when evaluated over a two-year period. The results confirm that the sound absorption of vegetated roofs is a function of substrate depth, plant community establishment, and moisture content in the plants and substrate. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available