4.4 Review

Cell biology of prion strains in vivo and in vitro

Journal

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
Volume 392, Issue 1, Pages 269-283

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-021-03572-y

Keywords

Prion; CJD; PrPSc; PrP(c); GAGSs; Endocytosis; Glycoseaminoglycan; Prion cell biology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through in vivo and in vitro assays, this study investigates the interactions between different prion strains and cell types and their contributions to prion disease pathology. The findings suggest a balance between prion propagation and degradation in cellular infection, which can be influenced by different cell lines.
The properties of infectious prions and the pathology of the diseases they cause are dependent upon the unique conformation of each prion strain. How the pathology of prion disease correlates with different strains and genetic backgrounds has been investigated via in vivo assays, but how interactions between specific prion strains and cell types contribute to the pathology of prion disease has been dissected more effectively using in vitro cell lines. Observations made through in vivo and in vitro assays have informed each other with regard to not only how genetic variation influences prion properties, but also how infectious prions are taken up by cells, modified by cellular processes and propagated, and the cellular components they rely on for persistent infection. These studies suggest that persistent cellular infection results from a balance between prion propagation and degradation. This balance may be shifted depending upon how different cell lines process infectious prions, potentially altering prion stability, and how fast they can be transported to the lysosome. Thus, in vitro studies have given us a deeper understanding of the interactions between different prions and cell types and how they may influence prion disease phenotypes in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available