4.8 Article

Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes

Journal

CELL
Volume 184, Issue 22, Pages 5635-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Merkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare
  2. NIH [U54HD090255, U01AI142756, RM1HG009490, R01EB031172, R35GM118062, R35GM138167-01]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  4. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  5. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
  6. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation [DRG-2262-16]
  7. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  8. Jane Coffin Childs postdoctoral fellowship
  9. Helen Hay Whitney post-doctoral fellowship
  10. Saint Baldrick's Foundation Scholar Award
  11. Kidz1stFund
  12. Chambers Family Innovation Fund
  13. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey via NCI-CCSG grant [P30CA072720]
  14. Searle Scholars Program
  15. NCI-CCSG grant [P30CA072720-5921]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that DNA mismatch repair (MMR) hinders prime editing and promotes undesired byproducts, but the efficiency of substitution, small insertion, and small deletion edits can be enhanced by developing PE4 and PE5 prime editing systems. Strategic silent mutations near the intended edit and optimization of prime editor protein also contribute to improved editing outcomes.
While prime editing enables precise sequence changes in DNA, cellular determinants of prime editing remain poorly understood. Using pooled CRISPRi screens, we discovered that DNA mismatch repair (MMR) impedes prime editing and promotes undesired indel byproducts. We developed PE4 and PE5 prime editing systems in which transient expression of an engineered MMR-inhibiting protein enhances the efficiency of substitution, small insertion, and small deletion prime edits by an average 7.7-fold and 2.0-fold compared to PE2 and PE3 systems, respectively, while improving edit/indel ratios by 3.4-fold in MMR-proficient cell types. Strategic installation of silent mutations near the intended edit can enhance prime editing outcomes by evading MMR. Prime editor protein optimization resulted in a PEmax architecture that enhances editing efficacy by 2.8-fold on average in HeLa cells. These findings enrich our understanding of prime editing and establish prime editing systems that show substantial improvement across 191 edits in seven mammalian cell types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available