4.7 Article

Internal calibration of transient kinetic data via machine learning

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 417, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2022.02.010

Keywords

Transient Kinetics; TAP; Cheminformatics; Calibration; Convex optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The TAP reactor provides valuable transient kinetic information, but preprocessing is necessary to reduce measurement uncertainty caused by noise and drift. Traditional preprocessing methods rely on user discretion and separate calibration experiments, while the proposed methodology uses machine learning techniques and physical constraints to improve the chemical kinetic signal.
The temporal analysis of products (TAP) reactor provides a vast amount of transient kinetic information that may be used to describe a variety of chemical features including residence time distributions, kinetic coefficients, number of active sites, reaction mechanism, etc. However, as with any measurement device, the TAP reactor signal is convoluted with noise and drift is common. To reduce the uncertainty of the kinetic measurement and any derived parameters or mechanisms, proper preprocessing must be performed prior to any advanced type of analysis. This preprocessing includes baseline correction, i.e., a shift in the voltage response, and calibration, i.e., a scaling of the flux response based on prior experiments. The traditional methodology of preprocessing requires significant user discretion and reliance on separate calibration experiments that may drift over time. Herein we use machine learning techniques combined with physical constraints to understand the noise and drift that is being generated within and between experiments for enhancement of the chemical kinetic signal. As such, the proposed methodology demonstrates clear benefits over the traditional preprocessing approach by eliminating the need for separate calibration experiments or heuristic input from the user.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available