4.6 Article

Design of CO2 hydrogenation catalysts based on phosphane/borane frustrated Lewis pairs and xanthene-derived scaffolds

Journal

CATALYSIS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2021.106385

Keywords

Frustrated Lewis pair; Xanthene; CO2 hydrogenation; Formic acid; DFT

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/R026939/1, EP/R026815/1, EP/R026645/1, EP/R027129/1, EP/M013219/1]
  2. FAPERJ [E-26/203.001/2017, E-26/010.101118/2018, E-26010.001424/2019]
  3. CNPq [309080/2015-0, 434955/2018-3]
  4. School of Chemistry in St Andrews
  5. EaStCHEM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New naphtho[2,1,8,7-klmn]xanthene and benzo[kl]xanthene-based intramolecular phosphane-borane frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) were studied for catalyzed H-2 activation and CO2 hydrogenation processes. According to DFT predictions, the presence of rigid scaffolds and increased P···B distances in the investigated FLPs significantly reduced the energy barrier for CO2 hydrogenation and minimized the energy differences between the transition states for H-2 activation and CO2 hydrogenation, making both processes feasible under relatively mild experimental conditions.
New naphtho[2,1,8,7-klmn]xanthene and benzo[kl]xanthene-based intramolecular phosphane-borane frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) were investigated in catalyzed H-2 activation and CO2 hydrogenation processes. According to DFT predictions at the B3LYP-D3 level, the presence of rigid scaffolds and increased P center dot center dot center dot B distances in the investigated FLPs lead to a remarkable drop in the energy barrier for CO2 hydrogenation (by up to 19.2 kcal mol(-1), compared to the parent dimethylxanthene-based FLP). Furthermore, the energy differences between the transition states for H-2 activation and CO2 hydrogenation are significantly reduced, making both processes feasible under relatively mild experimental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available