4.3 Article

CT-Guided Femoral Approach for Psoas Muscle Abscess Drainage

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 522-526

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03060-y

Keywords

Femoral approach; Psoas muscle abscess; Computed tomography guidance; Percutaneous drainage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CT-guided femoral approach is feasible, effective, and safe for draining psoas muscle abscesses in patients who cannot tolerate the prone position.
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the computed tomography (CT)-guided femoral approach for draining a psoas muscle abscess (PMA). Materials and Methods Between January 2014 and November 2018, the CT-guided femoral approach was employed for 9 abscesses in 8 patients who could not tolerate the prone position because of advanced age or other underlying conditions. A 17-gauge blunt metal needle was used to puncture the iliacus muscle below the groin under CT fluoroscopic guidance. A drainage catheter was then placed within the abscess cavity in the psoas major muscle. Technical success, clinical success, complications, the drainage therapy duration, susceptibility to antibiotics, survival, and recurrence were evaluated. Results The technical success rate was 100% among all nine lesions. The clinical success rate was 89% among all eight patients. One patient died of concomitant meningitis 15 days after the procedure. No patients developed therapy-related complications. The median duration of the drainage therapy was 15 days (range 6-71 days). Appropriate antibiotics based on the culture susceptibility were achieved in all patients. Four patients survived, and the remaining four died at 15 to 758 days (median, 36 days) after the procedure; no therapy-related deaths occurred. No recurrence was seen. Conclusion The CT-guided femoral approach seems feasible, effective, and safe for draining psoas muscle abscesses in ill patients who cannot tolerate the prone position.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available