4.7 Article

Flexible 2D nanocellulose-based SERS substrate for pesticide residue detection

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 277, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118890

Keywords

Nanocellulose; Flexible substrate; Surface enhanced Raman scattering; Sensor; Pesticide

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC19059003]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flexible and high-sensitivity two-dimensional SERS substrates based on self-assembled gold nanoflowers and silver-coated gold nanocubes were successfully developed on nanocrystalline cellulose film. The substrate could sensitively detect pesticide residues on apple surface and showed a linear relationship with pesticide concentration in the range of 10-100 mu g/L.
Nanocellulose holds considerable promise as an effective surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrate for sensitive detection of trace targets. Flexible and high-sensitivity two-dimensional (2D) SERS substrates based on nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC) film were successfully developed via self assembly of two plasma nanoparticles: gold nanoflowers (AuNFs) and silver-coated gold nanocubes (Au@AgNCs). The loading process allows the precise control of nanoparticle distribution density and uniformity on CNC film, which are closely related to the plasma coupling effect between particles. The obtained CNC/Au@AgNC flexible two-dimensional substrate could sensitively detect pesticide residues on apple surface, and the detection limits (LOD) of dimethoate and acetamiprid were 4.1 and 10.7 mu g/L, respectively. In addition, Raman signal intensity showed a good linear relationship with pesticide concentration in the range of 10-100 mu g/L, which provided great potential for high sensitivity and field detection of dangerous targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available