4.7 Article

Variation of resistant starch content in different processing types and their starch granules properties in rice

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 276, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118742

Keywords

Rice(Oryza sativa L; ); Resistant starch (RS); RS in raw milled rice; RS in hot cooked rice; Waxy; Starch granule

Funding

  1. Key Research & Development Program of Sichuan Province, China [2019YFN0019]
  2. Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project by Southwest University of Science and Technology [20ycx0038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that there is significant variability in resistant starch content in rice among different processing types, and different genes have different regulatory mechanisms for resistant starch content in different processing types. Strains with Waxy wildtype allele and SSIIa gene play a significant role in increasing resistant starch content.
Ninety-nine lines from recombinant inbred lines were selected to investigate the effects of starch synthesisrelated genes on resistant starch (RS) content in different proceeding types. RS in raw milled rice (RSm), hot cooked rice (RSc), and retrogradation rice (RSr) showed a wide variation among the lines, especially RSm arrived at 10.61%. Divergent variability of RSm, RSc and RSr indicated that there were different regulation mechanisms for them. Waxy wildtype allele (Wxa) could elevate RSm, RSc and RSr, but Soluble starch synthase IIa (SSIIa) only played a vital role in regulating RSm. Wxa-indica SSIIa could increase RSm, and Wxa-japonica SSIIa (SSIIaj) could elevate RSc and RSr. The mean diameter of Wxa-SSIIaj was significantly bigger than others. The bigger starch granules, the higher RSc and RSr. Starch granules morphology with high-RSm would have a higher percentage in polyhedral and angular shape. The results provide new information for rice breeding with high-RS content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available