4.5 Article

Identification of Breast Cancer Survivors With High Symptom Burden

Journal

CANCER NURSING
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 253-261

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000001019

Keywords

Breast cancer survivorship; Cancer-related symptoms; Cognitive impairment; Fatigue; Latent Profile Analysis; Quality of Life; Sleep disturbance

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [UG1CA189828, UG1CA233329]
  2. Hawn Foundation Fund for Education Programs in Pain Symptom Research
  3. Astellas
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Bayer
  6. Bristol Meyers Squibb
  7. Eli Lily
  8. Genentech
  9. Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified two subgroups of women with distinct symptom severity, with older and employed women less likely to be in the high symptom severity subgroup and women with poorer performance status more likely to be in the high subgroup. Women in the high subgroup reported lower quality of life and greater interference with functioning.
Background While women diagnosed with breast cancer have increased survival when compared with other cancers, survivorship may include residual symptom burden from treatment and continuing endocrine therapies. Objective The objective of this study was to identify subgroups of breast cancer survivors experiencing similar symptom severity. Methods Participants were 498 women with breast cancer, not on active treatment. Symptom severity was self-reported using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Target symptoms were included in a latent profile analysis. Factors related to subgroup membership and differences in quality of life (QOL) and functioning were explored using logistic regression. Results Mean age was 60.11 (SD, 11.32) years, 86.1% were white, and 79.1% were receiving endocrine therapy. Target symptoms included fatigue (reported at >= 5 by 22.8% of women), sleep disturbance (24.8%), and trouble remembering (17.2%). Two subgroups were identified: low symptom severity (77.0% of women) and high (23.0%). Older women (odds ratio [OR], 0.971; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.952-0.989) and employed women (OR, 0.621; 95% CI, 0404-0.956) were less likely to be in the high subgroup; women with poorer performance status (OR, 1.653; 95% CI, 1.188-2.299) were more likely to be in the high subgroup. Women in the high subgroup reported lower QOL (P = .000) and greater interference with functioning (P = .000). Conclusions Two subgroups of women with distinct symptom severity were identified. Implications for Practice Identification of women at risk for high symptoms during survivorship may allow clinicians to intensify their approach to symptom management, thereby mitigating poor outcomes and impairments in QOL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available