4.3 Article

Validity of breast cancer surgery treatment information in a state-based cancer registry

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 261-269

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01520-3

Keywords

Breast cancer; Epidemiology; Methods; Cancer registry; Validity

Funding

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health Policy Research Scholars Award
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research dissertation research award [R36HS027299]
  3. UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Cancer Research Fund via the State of North Carolina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surgery is a crucial part of early breast cancer treatment, with many studies relying on data sources that under-sample populations affected by care inequities. This study used cancer registry data combined with insurance claims to assess the accuracy of breast cancer surgery treatment information, finding that registry data reliably identified surgery receipt and type, especially in underrepresented populations.
Purpose Surgery is an important part of early stage breast cancer treatment that affects overall survival. Many studies of surgical treatment of breast cancer rely on data sources that condition on continuous insurance coverage or treatment at specified facilities and thus under-sample populations especially affected by cancer care inequities including the uninsured and rural populations. Statewide cancer registries contain data on first course of cancer treatment for all patients diagnosed with cancer but the accuracy of these data are uncertain. Methods Patients diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2003 and 2016 were identified using the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry and linked to Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance claims. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Kappa statistics for receipt of surgery and type of surgery (breast conserving surgery or mastectomy) using the insurance claims as the presumed gold standard. Analyses were stratified by race, insurance type, and rurality. Results Of 26,819 patients who met eligibility criteria, 23,125 were identified as having surgery in both the claims and registry for a sensitivity of 97.9% (95% CI 97.8%, 98.1%). There was also strong agreement for surgery type between the cancer registry and the insurance claims (Kappa: 0.91). Registry treatment data validity was lower for Medicaid insured patients than for Medicare and commercially insured patients. Conclusions Cancer registry treatment data reliably identified receipt and type of breast cancer surgery. Cancer registries are an important source of data for understanding cancer care in underrepresented populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available