4.7 Article

Transoral robotic surgery adoption and safety in treatment of oropharyngeal cancers

Journal

CANCER
Volume 128, Issue 4, Pages 685-696

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33995

Keywords

base of tongue (BOT) resection; margins; oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; postoperative mortality; tonsillectomy; transoral robotic surgery (TORS)

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30 CA016672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that the utilization of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in oropharyngeal cancer patients has been increasing annually, with significant differences in positive margin rates between surgical centers. The rates of 30-day unplanned readmission and early postoperative mortality after TORS were low, and high-volume centers had better outcomes with lower positive margin rates and early postoperative mortality.
Background Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2009 for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancers (oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [OPSCC]). This study investigated the adoption and safety of TORS. Methods All patients who underwent TORS for OPSCC in the National Cancer Data Base from 2010 to 2016 were selected. Trends in the positive margin rate (PMR), 30-day unplanned readmission, and early postoperative mortality were evaluated. Outcomes after TORS, nonrobotic surgery (NRS), and nonsurgical treatment were compared with matched-pair survival analyses. Results From 2010 to 2016, among 73,661 patients with OPSCC, 50,643 were treated nonsurgically, 18,024 were treated with NRS, and 4994 were treated with TORS. TORS utilization increased every year from 2010 (n = 363; 4.2%) to 2016 (n = 994; 8.3%). The TORS PMR for base of tongue malignancies decreased significantly over the study period (21.6% in 2010-2011 vs 15.8% in 2015-2016; P = .03). The TORS PMR at high-volume centers (>= 10 cases per year; 11.2%) was almost half that of low-volume centers (P < .001). The rates of 30-day unplanned readmission (4.1%) and 30-day postoperative mortality (1.0%) after TORS were low and did not vary over time. High-volume TORS centers had significantly lower rates of 30-day postoperative mortality than low-volume centers (0.5% vs 1.5%; P = .006). In matched-pair analyses controlling for clinicopathologic cofactors, 30-, 60-, and 90-day posttreatment mortality did not vary among patients with OPSCC treated with TORS, NRS, or nonsurgical treatment. Conclusions TORS has become widely adopted and remains safe across the country with a very low risk of severe complications comparable to the risk with NRS. Although safety is excellent nationally, high-volume TORS centers have superior outcomes with lower rates of positive margins and early postoperative mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available