4.2 Article

Patients' perspectives of prehabilitation as an extension of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages E578-E587

Publisher

CMA-CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014420

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) [PEG-151772]
  2. Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that patients experienced fear, isolation, and deterioration of their mental and physical states while waiting for surgery. They believed that a prehabilitation program could better prepare them for surgery by addressing emotional and physical needs, providing family support, and involving patients in a partnership based on respect for their expertise and desired level of engagement. Integrating patient priorities within ERAS and prehabilitative programs could improve satisfaction, experiences, and outcomes.
Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and prehabilitation programs are evidence-based and patient-focused, yet meaningful patient input could further enhance these interventions to produce superior patient outcomes and patient experiences. We conducted a qualitative study with patients who had undergone colorectal surgery under ERAS care to determine how they prepared for surgery, their views on prehabilitation and how prehabilitation could be delivered to best meet patient needs. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with adult patients who had undergone colorectal surgery under ERAS care within 3 months after surgery. Patients were enrolled between April 2018 and June 2019 through purposive sampling from 1 hospital in Alberta. The interview transcripts were analyzed independently by a researcher and a trained patient-researcher using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Twenty patients were interviewed. Three main themes were identified. First, waiting for surgery: patients described fear, anxiety, isolation and deterioration of their mental and physical states as they waited passively for surgery. Second, preparing would have been better than just waiting: patients perceived that a prehabilitation program could prepare them for their operation if it addressed their emotional and physical needs, provided personalized support, offered home strategies, involved family and included surgical expectations (both what to expect and what is expected of them). Third, partnering with patients: preoperative preparation should occur on a continuum that meets patients where they are at and in a partnership that respects patients' expertise and desired level of engagement. Conclusion: We identified several patient priorities for the preoperative period. Integrating these priorities within ERAS and prehabilitative programs could improve patient satisfaction, experiences and outcomes. Actively engaging patients in their care might alleviate some of the anxiety and fear associated with waiting passively for surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available