4.4 Article

Chalcogen Bond versus Halogen Bond: Changing Contributions in Determining the Crystal Packing of Dihalobenzochalcogenadiazoles

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
Volume 95, Issue 3, Pages 522-531

Publisher

CHEMICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.20220008

Keywords

Crystal engineering; Intermolecular interaction; Chalcogenadiazole

Funding

  1. MEXT
  2. JSPS Japan [20H02719, 20K21184, 21H01912, 21H05468]
  3. Research Program of Five-star Alliance in NJRC Mater. Dev. MEXT
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21H05468, 20H02719, 21H01912, 20K21184] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the crystals of 4,7-dihalobenzo[c][1,2,5]chalcogenadiazoles, the molecules are connected by competing chalcogen bond (ChB) and halogen bond (HaB). The relative contributions of ChB and HaB in determining the crystal packing can change depending on the type of chalcogen and halogen. This observation may be useful for designing new supramolecular synthons for crystal engineering.
In the crystals of 4,7-dihalobenzo[c][1,2,5]chalcogenadiazoles, the molecules are connected by two competing secondary bonding interactions: chalcogen bond (ChB) and halogen bond (HaB). Because the strengths of ChB and HaB change according to the kind of chalcogen (E: S, Se, Te) and halogen (X: Cl, Br, l), their relative contributions in determining the crystal packing can also change. Six newly determined crystal structures as well as 3 previously reported structures can be categorized into two groups: ChB-dominant and HaB-dominant structures. HaB in which X = I is strong enough to dictate the crystal packing of compounds with E = S and Se, but not where E = Te, whereas HaB in which X = Cl or Br has little effect on ChB-dominant molecular networks in crystals. The observed changing contributions of ChB and HaB may be useful for designing new supramolecular synthons for crystal engineering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available