On the Validity of the Stochastic Quasi-Steady-State Approximation in Open Enzyme Catalyzed Reactions: Timescale Separation or Singular Perturbation?

The quasi-steady-state approximation is widely used to develop simplified deterministic or stochastic models of enzyme catalyzed reactions. In deterministic models, the quasi-steady-state approximation can be mathematically justified from singular perturbation theory. For several closed enzymatic reactions, the homologous extension of the quasi-steady-state approximation to the stochastic regime, known as the stochastic quasi-steady-state approximation, has been shown to be accurate under the analogous conditions that permit the quasi-steady-state reduction in the deterministic counterpart. However, it was recently demonstrated that the extension of the stochastic quasi-steady-state approximation to an open Michaelis-Menten reaction mechanism is only valid under a condition that is far more restrictive than the qualifier that ensures the validity of its corresponding deterministic quasi-steady-state approximation. In this paper, we suggest a possible explanation for this discrepancy from the lens of geometric singular perturbation theory. In so doing, we illustrate a misconception in the application of the quasi-steady-state approximation: timescale separation does not imply singular perturbation.

Automated summary

The quasi-steady-state approximation is widely used in developing simplified deterministic or stochastic models of enzyme catalyzed reactions. The stochastic extension of this approximation has been shown to be accurate under certain conditions, but recent research has highlighted stricter requirements for its validity in open Michaelis-Menten reaction mechanisms.