4.0 Article

Sarcogyne similis (Acarosporaceae) produces psoromic acid and is confirmed to be widespread in North America

Journal

BRYOLOGIST
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages 91-101

Publisher

AMER BRYOLOGICAL LICHENOLOGICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745-125.1.091

Keywords

Biogeography; endemism; nomenclature; para-phenylenediamine; spot tests; typification

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Dimensions Award [1542639, 1542629]
  2. Division Of Environmental Biology
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1542629] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study confirms that Sarcogyne similis, widely distributed in eastern Canada and the United States, produces psoromic acid. It is also confirmed that S. reebiae is likely synonymous with S. similis. The type specimen of Sarcogyne similis f. convexa contains psoromic acid, while S. californica may belong to a different taxon. The distribution of S. dakotensis, which produces norstictic acid, is almost allopatric to that of S. similis.
Sarcogyne similis is found to produce psoromic acid, a substance previously known from only one other species in the family Acarosporaceae. Study of more than one hundred specimens from throughout the range of S. similis confirms the species is widely distributed from Nova Scotia, Canada, south throughout much of the eastern United States, and westward through the Sonoran Desert to southern California, where it occurs on non-calcareous rocks, especially sandstone. The recently proposed synonymy with S. reebiae is confirmed. Sarcogyne similis f. convexa is lectotypified with material that contains psoromic acid. The type of S. californica, currently treated as a synonym of S. similis, does not produce psoromic acid and may belong to a separate taxon. The distribution of S. dakotensis, which produces norstictic acid, appears to be nearly allopatric with S. similis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available