4.6 Article

Cost-effectiveness of full endoscopic versus open discectomy for sciatica

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 56, Issue 18, Pages 1018-1025

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104808

Keywords

spine; arthroscopy; randomized controlled trial

Categories

Funding

  1. ZonMw, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development [837004013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the costs and cost-effectiveness of PTED and open microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica. The results showed that PTED was more effective and less costly than open microdiscectomy in terms of leg pain and quality-adjusted life years. From a societal perspective, PTED was found to be more cost-effective.
Objective To assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) compared with open microdiscectomy among patients with sciatica. Methods This economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 12-month multicentre randomised controlled trial with a non-inferiority design, in which patients were randomised to PTED or open microdiscectomy. Patients were aged from 18 to 70 years and had at least 6 weeks of radiating leg pain caused by lumbar disc herniation. Effect measures included leg pain and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), as derived using the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Missing data were multiply imputed, bootstrapping was used to estimate statistical uncertainty, and various sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the robustness. Results Of the 613 patients enrolled, 304 were randomised to PTED and 309 to open microdiscectomy. Statistically significant differences in leg pain and QALYs were found in favour of PTED at 12 months follow-up (leg pain: 6.9; 95% CI 1.3 to 12.6; QALYs: 0.040; 95% CI 0.007 to 0.074). Surgery costs were higher for PTED than for open microdiscectomy (ie, euro4500/patient vs euro4095/patient). All other disaggregate costs as well as total societal costs were lower for PTED than for open microdiscectomy. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that the probability of PTED being less costly and more effective (ie, dominant) compared with open microdiscectomy was 99.4% for leg pain and 99.2% for QALYs. Conclusions Our results suggest that PTED is more cost-effective from the societal perspective compared with open microdiscectomy for patients with sciatica.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available