4.6 Article

Prehospital management of exertional heat stroke at sports competitions for Paralympic athletes

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 56, Issue 11, Pages 599-+

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104786

Keywords

disabled persons; body temperature regulation; hot temperature; wheelchair; athletes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prehospital management of exertional heat stroke in the Paralympic setting follows similar procedures as for Olympic athletes, with necessary adaptations to athlete physiology and practical considerations.
Objectives To adapt key components of exertional heat stroke (EHS) prehospital management proposed by the Intenational Olympic Committee Adverse Weather Impact Expert Working Group for the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020 so that it is applicable for the Paralympic athletes. Methods An expert working group representing members with research, clinical and lived sports experience from a Para sports perspective reviewed and revised the IOC consensus document of current best practice regarding the prehospital management of EHS. Results Similar to Olympic competitions, Paralympic competitions are also scheduled under high environmental heat stress; thus, policies and procedures for EHS prehospital management should also be established and followed. For Olympic athletes, the basic principles of EHS prehospital care are: early recognition, early diagnosis, rapid, on-site cooling and advanced clinical care. Although these principles also apply for Paralympic athletes, slight differences related to athlete physiology (eg, autonomic dysfunction) and mechanisms for hands-on management (eg, transferring the collapsed athlete or techniques for whole-body cooling) may require adaptation for care of the Paralympic athlete. Conclusions Prehospital management of EHS in the Paralympic setting employs the same procedures as for Olympic athletes with some important alterations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available