4.1 Article

A novel surgical technique for treatment of symptomatic Tarlov cysts

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 188-192

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.2016623

Keywords

Tarlov cyst; perineural cyst; microsurgical treatment pain; recurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective study described a novel and simple surgical technique for treating symptomatic Tarlov cysts. By performing microsurgical puckering of the cyst, recurrence can be prevented and good clinical outcomes can be achieved.
Background The aim of this retrospective study was to describe a novel, simple surgical technique for the treatment of symptomatic Tarlov cysts. Methods A total of 40 patients with symptomatic Tarlov cysts, admitted to our tertiary center between 1998 and 2019 constituted the study group. All patients underwent microsurgical puckering of the cyst, the technique we described to prevent a recurrence. Patients' symptoms, radiological findings, intraoperative findings, and clinical results were evaluated. Results Of the 40 patients (5 males, 35 females) whose charts were reviewed, the mean age was 28.4 (range, 17-61) years. The mean follow-up was 8 (range, 3 months to 21 years) years. Preoperatively, the most common symptoms were leg pain and numbness of the lower extremity. Postoperatively, no major complications were observed. Clinical progression was halted in all patients; 33 (82%) patients recovered completely and seven (17%) patients reported partial recovery. Cystic cavity persisted radiologically in five (12%) patients, decreased in size in 30 (75%) patients, and regressed completely in the remaining five (12%) patients. None of the patients had permanent neurological deficits. Conclusion Puckering of the cyst membrane is a safe and easy-to-perform surgical technique for symptomatic Tarlov cysts. This technique can be used almost in all cases instead of the commonly used microsurgical cyst excision or cyst fenestration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available