4.6 Article

A randomised controlled provider-blinded trial of community health workers in sickle cell anaemia: effects on haematologic variables and hydroxyurea adherence

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 196, Issue 1, Pages 193-203

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17952

Keywords

Hydroxyurea; sickle cell disease; adherence; case management

Categories

Funding

  1. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health [R18 HL112737]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients eligible for hydroxyurea treatment who were exposed to patient navigators showed improvements in starting hydroxyurea treatment and adherence, but there were no significant differences in hematological parameters between the experimental and control groups at 12 months.
Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) (HU) for sickle cell anaemia (SCA) is underutilised. Case management is an evidence-based health management strategy and in this regard patient navigators (PNs) may provide case management for SCA. We hypothesised that HU-eligible patients exposed to PNs would have improved indicators of starting HU and HU adherence. We randomised 224 HU-eligible SCA adults into the Start Healing in Patients with Hydroxyurea (SHIP-HU) Trial. All patients received care from trained physicians using standardised HU prescribing protocols. Patients in the Experimental arm received case management and education from PNs through multiple contacts. All other patients were regarded as the Control arm and received specialty care alone. Study physicians were blinded to the study arms and did not interact with PNs. At baseline, 6 and 12 months we assessed and compared laboratory parameters and HU adherence indicators. Experimental patients had higher 6-month mean fetal haemoglobin (HbF) levels than controls. But at 12 months, mean HbF was similar, as were white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, total haemoglobin, platelet count and mean corpuscular volume. At 12 months there were fewer experimental patients missing HU doses than controls (mean 1 center dot 8 vs. 4 center dot 5, P = 0 center dot 0098), and more recent HU prescriptions filled than for controls (mean 53 center dot 8 vs. 92 days, median 27 center dot 5 vs. 62 days, P = 0 center dot 0082). Mean HU doses were largely similar. We detected behavioural improvements in HU adherence but no haematological improvements by adding PNs to specialty care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available